tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1021507625616302513.post227239028416028282..comments2023-10-20T07:27:45.557-04:00Comments on Conspiracy.Com: "The Being" Part 4SabrebIadehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00694883990796225494noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1021507625616302513.post-50569244407630446602009-01-19T07:38:00.000-05:002009-01-19T07:38:00.000-05:00If you read the first intro. there will be minimal...If you read the first intro. there will be minimal if not zero questions answered...but, regardless of your question, in all its depth in diatribe, and yes what you say about my kind or 'being' as you put it, is quite true, but you query over a simple quandary. It is carried into categories of knowledge, as one would use labels to a series of books, i.e. a series of multiverses and when utilizingThe Beinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17319523701779871235noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1021507625616302513.post-3768814632925456602009-01-18T10:30:00.000-05:002009-01-18T10:30:00.000-05:00can you please fill us in on why a higher dimensio...can you please fill us in on why a higher dimensional being would use the fourth dimension "time" as a basis for categorizing knowlege when "time" only exists for us as the thermodynamic expression of entropy, and for this alleged "being" temporal effects would be non-existent. Exactly how do you use time to catalog knowlege? Thanks.gnostic 23-7https://www.blogger.com/profile/14465359124220877742noreply@blogger.com