The Osama bin Laden Conspiracy - Redux

Previously on Conspiracy.com I was talking about the Osama bin Laden Conspiracy and how I thought it would join the ranks of all the other popular conspiracy theories.
Well I started looking at the popular terms here and "Geronimo" popped up.
I thought "Well that's because the SEAL codename for Osama bin Laden was Geronimo."

Nope.

It was because of an entry I did back in January of 2010 where I mentioned that Christie's auction house was auctioning off a human skull that once belonged to the Skull and Bones Society.
The skull in question was rumored to be the skull of the famous Apache leader, Geronimo.

Although Harlyn Geronimo, Geronimo's great-grandson said this...

"Whether it was intended only to name the military operation to kill or capture Osama bin Laden or to give Osama bin Laden himself the code name Geronimo, either was an outrageous insult and mistake. And it is clear from the military records released that the name Geronimo was used at times by military personnel involved for both the military operation and for Osama bin Laden himself.
Obviously to equate Geronimo with Osama bin Laden is an unpardonable slander of Native America and its most famous leader in history.
And to call the operation to kill or capture Osama bin Laden by the name Geronimo is such a subversion of history that it also defames a great human spirit and Native American leader. For Geronimo himself was the focus of precisely such an operation by the U.S. military, an operation that assured Geronimo a lasting place in American and human history."

It may have been an "insult and mistake" as Harlyn says, but he also says that "Geronimo himself was the focus of precisely such an operation by the U.S. military".

That made me start thinking.
What if the reason Osama's body was buried at sea was because they cut off his head, with the intention of sending the skull to Skull and Bones Society as a trophy?
As you probably already know, Prescott Bush was one of the six members of the Yale secret society that were implicated in stealing Geronimo's skull in the first place.
Remember when Vice President Dick Cheney said he would willingly accept the al-Qaeda leader’s head "on a platter"?
Okay I know that's a figure of speech and it is "Darth Cheney" we are talking about here.

Of course there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to back any of this up.
It's just a theory.
But that's what the blog is about right?

By the way, it seems Loren Coleman is also thinking along the same lines (maybe I'm not as crazy as I think) and has a very in depth write up about this on his blog here:
http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2011/05/geronimo.html

The NAU is No Conspiracy Theory | The John Birch Society - Truth, Leadership, Freedom

Image via WikipediaThe NAU is No Conspiracy Theory The John Birch Society - Truth, Leadership, Freedom:

"Conservative blogger John Hawkins ranked Jerome Corsi as the #3 most annoying person on the Right. And what did Corsi do to earn such a title? According to Hawkins the charge stems from Corsi's 'kooky' beliefs that the North American Union (NAU) is actually a stealth plan that would eventually merge the United States, Canada and Mexico into one EU-like nation.
Commenting on Corsi, Hawkins wrote:
Nobody has worked harder to convince people that the completely moronic North American conspiracy theory is real than the right's version of Dylan Avery, kooky Jerome Corsi.
Hawkins is quick to judge Corsi for his NAU beliefs, yet gives little in support of why the agreement is not a threat to this nation. In Hawkins' blog posts, he concludes that President Bush 'cannot arbitrarily combine the US with Mexico and Canada.' However, one only has to look at the European Union to see that when countries join in an economic or security agreement, a total integration takes place – even without a ratified constitution.
Furthermore, Hawkins harps on the fact that the NAU plan was orchestrated by Robert Pastor who – as a member or the Council on Foreign Relations – has no impact on government policy. Hawkins fails to explain to his readers that the CFR's membership has dominated the Executive Branch of our nation's government for the past several decades, and impacts our nation's policies and direction every single day. Although the CFR claims to not officially play a part in our government policies, one only has to look at members of the Bush administration (as well as previous administrations), who are also members of the CFR, to see the level of dominance they have exerted."