Videos that show the fall of 7 World Trade Center have become a mainstay of presentations of the controlled demolition hypothesis. This was a 47-story steel-framed skyscraper that stood across Vesey Street north of the main WTC complex. Though not hit by a plane, it collapsed at about 5:20 p.m. EDT on the evening of September 11, 2001. No modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever before collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire. NIST has postponed publication of its report several times, attributing the delays to reassignment of investigators to other tasks.
In addition to its being officially unexplained, proponents of controlled demolition often emphasize the collapse of WTC7 for two reasons. First, because it was not hit by a plane and, second, because its collapse looked even more like a bottom-to-top standard controlled demolition than the more explosive top-to-bottom collapses of the two main towers. Support for this theory comes from visually observed features of the collapse--the swift and symmetrical fall, the pulverization of concrete, the lateral ejection of debris from high up for large distances. They also cite an early report of molten and partly evaporated steel found in the debris.
In the PBS documentary America Rebuilds, which aired in September 2002, Larry Silverstein, the owner of Building Seven and leaseholder and insurance policy holder for the remainder of the WTC Complex, recalled a conversation with the Fire Department commander in which it was decided that "the smartest thing to do is just pull it", after which they "watched the building collapse." While Silverstein has issued a statement that rejects this interpretation, proponents of controlled demolition have taken the remark as a confession that the building was intentionally demolished.
In a New York Magazine interview in March 2006, Dr S. Shyam Sunder, NIST's lead WTC disaster investigator, said "We are studying the horizontal movement east to west, internal to the structure, on the fifth to seventh floors," and then added, "but truthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on Building No. 7." Hugo Bachmann and Jörg Schneider, both of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, believe that building 7 was intentionally demolished based on video footage.
Proponents have timed the collapse at just under seven seconds. Preliminary official investigations do not include the mechanics of the actual collapse, concentrating instead on the events leading up to it. The FEMA report begins its "timed collapse sequence" with a seismic event recorded at 5:22:33 pm. FEMA marks this as the time the building "begins to collapse." At this time, the report says, the east and west mechanical penthouses--the structures at the very top of the building--are still intact. Approximately thirty seconds later, FEMA says, video evidence shows the east mechanical penthouse begin to disappear into the building. Five seconds later the west penthouse also disappears, and at 5:22:10 "WTC 7 collapses completely." This is roughly the point at which Jones begins timing the collapse, noting that his results correspond with the free, unimpeded fall of the roofline. This observed "near freefall" collapse time is a recurrent theme of the controlled demolition hypothesis.
Showing posts with label world trade center attacks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label world trade center attacks. Show all posts
Sunday, January 21, 2007
9/11 Conspiracy Theories,controlled demolition hypothesis 2
Friday, January 19, 2007
9/11 Conspiracy Theories,Controlled Demolition Hypothesis
The controlled demolition hypothesis is the disputed proposition that the World Trade Center was not destroyed by the planes that crashed into it as part of the September 11th attacks, nor by the fires that followed, but by explosives or other devices planted in the buildings in advance.
Though the findings of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) do not suggest that controlled demolition was involved, the hypothesis has become central to the 9/11 Truth Movement.
The most detailed statements of the hypothesis have come from Steven E. Jones, Kevin Ryan, Jim Hoffman, David Ray Griffin and Webster Griffin Tarpley. In making their case, they often emphasize the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, which was not hit by a plane.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
I have been seeing quite a bit of the "US Navy Map of the Future" since the Japan earthquake and tsunami. Does anyone actu...
-
Project Superman: Andy Pero This, to me, is one of the more facinating stories to come out of Montauk. Mainly because a lot of what he said ...
-
Since Paul Bennewitz introduced the story of the Dulce Base, the conspiracy theories have grown, and have flourished on the World Wide We...
-
And while we are talking about movies, here's another upcoming film called " The Fourth Kind ". The film is directed by O...
-
Natural News has reported this..... Homeschooling Banned in California as State Turns Parents Into Criminals for Teaching Their Own Children...
-
U.S. military caused the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami With Afghanistan and Iraq already lost, the Wall Street bankers were all desperately look...
-
edmontonsun.com - Alberta - Bus beheading threat : "A harrowing bus ride from Fort McMurray is over for two brothers who feared they we...
-
NOW the Italian Air force is disclosing it's UFO documents online. Seems to be a trend huh? Is the world getting ready for full disclosu...
-
Man puts window linked to assassination of President Kennedy up for auction - International Herald Tribune : "DALLAS: A window owned by...
-
HITLER HIRED TO START WW2... WASN'T EVEN ANTI SEMITE : "The ink wasn't dry on the Versailles Peace Treaty before the Illuminati...